Current:Home > StocksNew York law couldn’t be used to disarm reservist before Maine shooting, Army official says -OceanicInvest
New York law couldn’t be used to disarm reservist before Maine shooting, Army official says
View
Date:2025-04-17 05:33:25
AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — The Army couldn’t use New York’s red flag law to disarm a reservist experiencing a mental health crisis before a mass shooting in Maine because he was not a New York resident, a nurse practitioner told an independent commission.
Maj. Matthew Dickison testified that Robert Card was displaying psychosis and paranoia in July 2023 when he evaluated Card at an Army hospital, where Card was taken for evaluation. Dickison concluded Card was unfit for duty and shouldn’t have access to guns, and said he was surprised when Card was released two weeks later from a private psychiatric hospital.
Months later in Maine, 18 people were killed when Card opened fire at two locations in October in the deadliest mass shooting in Maine history. Card died by suicide, and his body was found two days later.
Dickison told commissioners on Thursday that he attempted to use New York’s SAFE Act to temporarily seize Card’s weapons but gave up when it appeared the law could only be used on New York residents. Card, from Bowdoin, Maine, was in New York to train West Point cadets when fellow reservists became alarmed by his behavior.
A civilian Army medical contractor, meanwhile, defied a subpoena to appear before the independent commission, which is investigating facts surrounding the shooting and what could’ve been done to prevent it.
Anne Jordan, the commission’s executive director, said that she was told that the witness, identified as Patricia Moloney, declined to testify because she was the subject of a possible medical malpractice claim. It was unclear if that claim stemmed from the shootings in Maine on Oct. 25 at a bowling alley and at a bar and grill.
The commission ended a session that was being conducted via Zoom after Moloney failed to appear Thursday, and then reconvened several hours later with Dickison’s testimony from Korea, where he is now stationed.
Dickison is a nurse practitioner whose specialty is psychiatry, and he was on temporary assignment at Keller Army Hospital when Card arrived for evaluation. Card repeated his claims that people were calling him a pedophile behind his back, along with his ominous warnings that he might have to do something about it. From there, Card was taken to a private psychiatric hospital for treatment.
Dickison’s actions have been discussed before during testimony from other witnesses, including the leader of Card’s Army Reserve unit, Capt. Jeremy Reamer, but Thursday marked the first time he addressed the commission.
Dickson said he gave a list of post-hospitalization recommendations to Reamer that included ensuring Card’s personal weapons were confiscated and that Card attended health care appointments and took his medicine. But Reamer previously testified that his authority as commander applied only when soldiers were on drill.
The commission has previously delved into New York’s red flag law and Maine’s yellow flag laws, both of which allow guns to be seized from someone in a psychiatric crisis under certain circumstances. The commission issued an interim report in March saying law enforcement should have seized Card’s guns and put him in protective custody using the state’s yellow flag law.
Police in Maine testified that the family had agreed to remove Card’s guns, but the commission said leaving such a task to them “was an abdication of law enforcement’s responsibility.”
veryGood! (15871)
Related
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Beyoncé Honors Tina Turner's Strength and Resilience After Her Death
- Say Cheers to National Drink Wine Day With These Wine Glasses, Champagne Flutes & Accessories
- With growing abortion restrictions, Democrats push for over-the-counter birth control
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- For Exxon, a Year of Living Dangerously
- PGA Tour officials to testify before Senate subcommittee
- ‘Super-Pollutant’ Emitted by 11 Chinese Chemical Plants Could Equal a Climate Catastrophe
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- The Limit Does Not Exist On How Grool Pregnant Lindsay Lohan's Beach Getaway Is
Ranking
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Search for missing Titanic sub includes armada of specialized planes, underwater robots and sonar listening equipment
- Ophelia Dahl on her Radcliffe Prize and lessons learned from Paul Farmer and her youth
- An abortion doula explains the impact of North Carolina's expanded limitations
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Arctic Report Card 2019: Extreme Ice Loss, Dying Species as Global Warming Worsens
- Hunter Biden to appear in court in Delaware in July
- Amory Lovins: Freedom From Fossil Fuels Is a Possible Dream
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
For Exxon, a Year of Living Dangerously
Could Exxon’s Climate Risk Disclosure Plan Derail Its Fight to Block State Probes?
Tesla’s Battery Power Could Provide Nevada a $100 Billion Jolt
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Selling Sunset’s Bre Tiesi Confronts Chelsea Lazkani Over Nick Cannon Judgment
South Carolina is poised to renew its 6-week abortion ban
Facing cancer? Here's when to consider experimental therapies, and when not to