Current:Home > MyKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -OceanicInvest
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-13 16:26:11
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (27)
Related
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Knicks' Mitchell Robinson invites his high school coach to move in with him after coach's wife died
- If you're having a panic attack, TikTokers say this candy may cure it. Experts actually agree.
- Man dies in landslide at Minnesota state park
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Health is on the agenda at UN climate negotiations. Here's why that's a big deal
- Sister Wives' Janelle Brown Shares the One Thing She’d Change About Her Marriage to Kody
- Logan Sargeant, the only American F1 driver, getting another shot in 2024 after tough rookie year
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Father of Palestinian American boy slain outside Chicago files wrongful death lawsuit
Ranking
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- In some neighborhoods in drought-prone Kenya, clean water is scarce. Filters are one solution
- Report: Contaminants being removed from vacant Chicago lot where migrant housing is planned
- Israel says more hostages released by Hamas as temporary cease-fire holds for 7th day
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- More than 100 Gaza heritage sites have been damaged or destroyed by Israeli attacks
- Texas must remove floating Rio Grande border barrier, federal appeals court rules
- Logan Sargeant, the only American F1 driver, getting another shot in 2024 after tough rookie year
Recommendation
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Indonesia’s Marapi volcano erupts, spewing ash plumes and blanketing several villages with ash
US military affirms it will end live-fire training in Hawaii’s Makua Valley
Travis Kelce stats: How Chiefs TE performs with, without Taylor Swift in attendance
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
Federal judge tosses lawsuit alleging environmental racism in St. James Parish
Taylor Swift was Spotify's most-streamed artist in 2023. Here's how to see Spotify Wrapped
1 person is dead and 11 missing after a landslide and flash floods hit Indonesia’s Sumatra island